Sales vs review scores
So, it turns out that Enslaved: Journey to the West hasn’t sold too well, despite receiving generally positive review scores.
It does make me wonder what role reviews play in an age when the majority of players can download a demo and find out what they think of the game themselves. Beyond mentioning how representative of the final game the demo is, I suppose. If people are playing the demo and deciding it’s not worth buying, are the high scoring reviews out of touch with their audience?
And given that reviewers are generally receiving free copies of the games they’re playing, are they really best placed to suggest which games are worth my £40 the most? It would appear that a lot of gamers are generally holding off and waiting for short titles with no (or no compelling) multiplayer component to drop in price. Which is happening sooner and sooner. Enslaved has already been down to around £20.
Should reviewers be acting like informed friends, trying to pull the consumer towards buying games that may be more artistically worthy, or should reviews keep their audience’s tastes in mind, and point them in the direction of more of the same that they will enjoy?
In particular I’m wondering all of this on the eve of the launch of Call of Duty: Black Ops. A game that’s sure to sell more than anything else this year. Aside from the advertising money from the hits you’ll get, is there any point in a website reviewing Black Ops (positively or negatively) at all?
- 4 Comments »
-
Posted by FreakyZoid on Monday, November 8, 2010 at 6:44 pm
Tags: Games



Pingback: Mainly About Games » Blog Archive » Success stories